Fitness

HHS Is Writing Its First Step-Count Guidance: What the 2027 Update Means for You

HHS is adding step-count and strength guidance to the US activity guidelines in 2027. What's confirmed, what isn't, and how to comment by Nov 12.

The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is preparing its first official step-count guidance, along with new guidance on muscle-strengthening activity, as a 2027 supplement to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. No step target has been proposed yet. Right now HHS is only collecting evidence. Anyone can submit a written comment until 11:59 p.m. ET on November 12, 2026.

This article is based on the Federal Register notice (FR Doc. 2026-20833) as filed for public inspection, and on the studies cited below, all checked on 12 October 2026. It is general information, not medical advice.

The HHS notice at a glance, checked 12 October 2026
ItemDetail
What it isA notice requesting written public comments. It is not a rule or proposed rule.
Issued byOffice of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, HHS
What it will informPhysical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition Supplement: 2027 Steps and Muscle-Strengthening Guidance
Federal Register publicationOctober 13, 2026 (FR Doc. 2026-20833; 91 FR 64935)
Comment deadline11:59 p.m. ET, November 12, 2026
Where to commentRegulations.gov, docket HHS-OASH-2026-0463
Proposed step numberNone

What HHS announced

The Federal Register notice says that “HHS is working on supplementing the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition by adding new, science-based step count and muscle-strengthening activity guidance.”

The notice makes one request. HHS wants comments that “highlight existing high-quality, evidence-based reports, programs, or campaigns related to steps and/or muscle-strengthening physical activity and related positive health outcomes.” It does not list specific questions, propose new wording or name a release date beyond the “2027” in the supplement’s title. HHS says comments “will be reviewed by the team of federal experts supporting the Physical Activity Guidelines work.” The notice is signed by Katrina L. Piercy, Deputy Director of ODPHP.

The guidelines themselves were first published in 2008, and the second edition followed in 2018. The notice calls them “the benchmark and primary, authoritative voice of the federal government” on physical activity and health.

What the current guidelines already say

Nothing changes for now. According to ODPHP’s summary of the current guidelines, adults should:

  • Move more and sit less. “Any amount of physical activity has some health benefits.”
  • Get at least 150 to 300 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity a week, such as brisk walking. Vigorous activity counts as well: 75 to 150 minutes is the equivalent range in the full 2018 guidelines.
  • Do muscle-strengthening activity at least 2 days a week, “like lifting weights or doing push-ups.” The full text says this should be of moderate or greater intensity and work all major muscle groups.

The current guidelines contain no daily step target. The notice does not say the 150-minute aerobic recommendation is under review. It describes the 2027 guidance as a supplement to the second edition, not a replacement for it.

Why there has never been a US step target

The 2018 guidelines considered step counts and decided not to set a target. A review written by members of the 2018 advisory committee (Kraus et al., 2019) found only 11 relevant studies published between 2011 and March 2018. The authors agreed that more steps were linked to better health, but concluded that “more independent studies will be required before these observations can be translated into public health guidelines.”

The evidence base has grown considerably since then, mostly because wearables made step data easy to collect in large groups of people. The new notice does not say why HHS is acting now. The two studies below are the main ones it is likely to have to weigh.

What the step-count research shows

Paluch et al., 2022. This meta-analysis in The Lancet Public Health pooled data from 15 cohorts covering 47,471 adults. Compared with the least active quarter of people (median about 3,550 steps a day), the most active quarter (median about 10,900) had a 53% lower risk of death during follow-up. The benefit levelled off at about 6,000–8,000 steps a day in adults aged 60 and over and about 8,000–10,000 steps a day in adults under 60.

Ding et al., 2025. This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis, also in The Lancet Public Health, covered 57 studies from 35 cohorts. It looked at more outcomes than mortality alone. Compared with 2,000 steps a day, 7,000 steps a day was associated with:

Ding et al. (2025): 7,000 vs 2,000 steps a day, selected outcomes
OutcomeAssociated risk differenceCertainty of evidence (GRADE)
All-cause mortality47% lowerModerate
Cardiovascular disease incidence25% lowerModerate
Cancer mortality37% lowerModerate
Type 2 diabetes14% lowerModerate
Dementia38% lowerModerate
Depressive symptoms22% lowerModerate
Falls28% lowerVery low

For mortality, cardiovascular disease, dementia and falls, the curves bent at about 5,000–7,000 steps a day. Beyond that point, extra steps still helped, but each one added less. The authors wrote that 10,000 steps “can still be a viable target for those who are more active,” while 7,000 “might be a more realistic and achievable target for some.” They also noted limitations, including few studies for most outcomes, no age-specific analysis and possible residual confounding.

What this does and does not tell you. These are observational associations, not proof that steps alone cause the benefit. They are also research findings, not HHS policy. HHS could set a single number, a range, age-specific targets or something else entirely. We have explained the practical trade-offs in 7,000 vs 10,000 steps a day.

Why strength training is part of the update

Most adults do not meet the current muscle-strengthening guideline. Healthy People 2030 tracks this as objective PA-04. Its most recent figure is that 32.9% of adults did muscle-strengthening activity in their leisure time on 2 or more days a week (2024, age-adjusted, self-reported). The 2030 target is 36.6%.

The research supports doing some strength work even when the amount is modest:

  • Momma et al., 2022 (British Journal of Sports Medicine) analysed 16 cohort studies. Muscle-strengthening activity was associated with a 10–17% lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, total cancer, diabetes and lung cancer. The largest risk reduction appeared at about 30–60 minutes a week. The authors said the effect of higher volumes was unclear. Combining strength and aerobic activity was associated with lower mortality than doing neither.
  • The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) published an updated resistance-training position stand in March 2026. It recommends training all major muscle groups at least twice a week. It says bands, bodyweight exercises and home routines all produce meaningful results, and that the biggest gain comes from going from no resistance training to some.

The HHS notice does not say whether the supplement will add minutes, sets or other detail to the current “2 days a week” recommendation.

What has not been decided

  • No step number. Figures such as 7,000, 8,000 or 10,000 come from research and popular culture, not from HHS.
  • No change to the strength recommendation yet. It is still at least 2 days a week, covering all major muscle groups.
  • No final publication date beyond “2027.”
  • No process details beyond this comment period. The notice names no advisory committee and does not say whether a draft will be released for comment.

Other bodies are also updating their guidance. On 10 July 2026, the UK Chief Medical Officers updated their activity guidelines. The UK update “does not introduce new physical activity targets,” keeps 150 minutes a week, includes no step target and encourages “strength and balance exercises as part of everyday life.” The UK guidance does not predict what the US will decide, but it shows that national health bodies are paying more attention to strength.

How to submit a comment

  1. Find the docket. The notice says comments are accepted via regulations.gov on docket HHS-OASH-2026-0463. On 12 October 2026, the day before publication, the docket was not yet searchable. If you cannot find it, open the Federal Register document and use the comment link or docket reference shown there.
  2. Send evidence, not just opinions. HHS asks for reports, programs or campaigns on steps or muscle-strengthening activity and health outcomes, with “appropriate supporting documentation for scientific justification (e.g., verifiable data sets, links to case studies, published research papers).”
  3. Cite and link instead of attaching. HHS suggests “complete citations or abstracts and electronic links to full articles or reports, rather than attachments.”
  4. Know how comments are weighed. HHS says it decides on “the scientific justification for the recommendation,” not on the number of comments for or against a topic. A well-sourced comment matters more than a petition-style one.
  5. Submit before the deadline. Comments must arrive by 11:59 p.m. ET on November 12, 2026. Individuals and organizations may submit more than one comment.

Questions about the process go to ODPHP at PhysicalActivityGuidelines@hhs.gov, the contact listed in the notice.

What to do in the meantime

You do not need to wait for 2027. The current guidelines already give you a clear plan, and the new evidence fits within it.

If you have a health condition, are pregnant or are returning to exercise after an illness or injury, check with a qualified clinician about what is appropriate for you.

FAQs

Is HHS changing the 150-minute exercise recommendation?

The notice does not say so. It describes adding step-count and muscle-strengthening guidance to the second edition. Until HHS publishes something new, the recommendation remains 150–300 minutes of moderate activity a week plus muscle-strengthening on at least 2 days.

Will the new guidance recommend 7,000 or 10,000 steps a day?

Nobody knows yet, and HHS has not proposed a number. Recent meta-analyses suggest most of the mortality benefit comes by roughly 7,000–8,000 steps, with age differences. HHS will have to weigh that evidence along with the comments it receives.

Who can comment?

Anyone, whether an individual or an organization, and the notice allows more than one comment. Comments backed by citations and links to published research or program data are the most useful to HHS.

When will the final guidance come out?

The notice gives no date beyond the “2027” in the supplement’s title.

Sources